Public Petitions

 

The Committee is currently considering the following public petitions

PE1280: Fatal accidents inquiry

PE1370: Justice for Megrahi

PE1427: Multi-party actions

PE1449: Replacement  for the Scottish Committee of the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council

PE1479: Complaints about solicitors

PE1504: Supreme Court (Civil Appeals)

PE 1510 and PE 1511: Control Rooms

Petition PE1280

Back to top.

PE1280 by Julie Love and Dr Kenneth Faulds on amending the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (Scotland) Act 1976 to require the holding of a fatal accident inquiry when a person from Scotland dies abroad.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 8 November 2011 and agreed to write to the Scottish Government requesting further details of when it intends to introduce legislation to amend the 1976 Act and to keep the petition open, pending the Scottish Government's response.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 10 January 2012 and agreed to keep the petition open pending the introduction of the relevant primary legislation and to consider, at a future meeting, a background paper on the Committee Bill Procedure.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 25 September 2012 and agreed to keep the petition open pending the introduction of legislation on fatal accident inquiries.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 18 February 2014 and agreed to write to the Scottish Government asking for an update on its plans to introduce legislation in this area.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed to note developments, to write to the Scottish Government seeking an update on the timescale for the introduction of legislation on fatal accident inquiries, and to consider the petition again once that legislation has been introduced.

Petition PE1370

Back to top.

PE1370 by Dr Jim Swire, Professor Robert Black QC, Mr Robert Forrester, Father Patrick Keegans and Mr Iain McKie on behalf of Justice for Megrahi on opening an independent inquiry into the 2001 Kamp van Zeist conviction of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi for the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 in December 1988.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 8 November 2011and agreed, by division (For 6, Against 3, Abstentions 0), to keep the petition open pending the outcome of Lord Carloway's review of Scottish criminal procedure and evidence and the Committee's consideration of forthcoming Scottish Government legislation concerning the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission. 

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 25 September 2012 and agreed to keep the petition open pending a response from the Scottish Government to correspondence from Justice for Megrahi.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 11 December 2012 and agreed to keep the petition open while the petitioners continue to pursue issues with the Scottish Government, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary.

On 2 April 2013, Justice for Megrahi updated the Justice Committee on developments of their allegations of criminality in relation to the investigations of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103.  Justice for Megrahi submitted a further report to the Justice Committee on 23 April 2013 after their meeting with Deputy Chief Constable Patrick Shearer.  Links to the two documents are below.

The Committee considered the submissions above at its meeting on 4 June 2013.  At that meeting the Committee agreed to write to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and the Scottish Government.  Papers from that meeting along with the correspondence arising from it are below.

Justice for Megrahi provided a submission to the Committee on 23 August 2013 summarising a meeting with Police Scotland and raising concerns about the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.

On 5 September 2013 the Convener wrote to Justice for Megrahi regarding any possibility of a referal of the conviction of Mr Abdel al-Megrahi to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission for review.  Justice for Megrahi replied on 7 September 2013 and both letters can be found below.

The Committee considered petition PE1370 at its meeting on 24 September 2013 and decided to keep the petition open.  Prior to the meeting, Justice for Megrahi informed the Committee that it had reported its concerns about the conduct of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice to the International Association of Prosecutors. Police Scotland also wrote to the Committee regarding its meeting with Justice for Megrahi on 16 and 19 August.  The Committee papers, the submission from the petitioners and the letter from Police Scotland can be found below.

Following Police Scotland's letter of 24 September, the Convener wrote to Police Scotland on 31 October 2013 asking for an update on the the conflict between its investigation into the allegations of Justice for Megrahi and the on-going investigation into the Lockerbie disaster itself.  Police Scotland replied on 4 November indicating that the conflict between the two investigations still exists and that it will be resolved soon.   Both letters can be found below.

Justice for Megrahi provided a written submission to the Committee on 30 January 2014.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 18 February 2014 and agreed to write to the Chief Constable and the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC).

On 18 February 2014, Police Scotland provided a copy of its letter dated 17 February 2014 to Mr Robert Forrester, Secretary of the Justice for Megrahi Committee, in response to specific questions that he raised in respect of the complaint investigation.

 The SCCRC and Police Scotland replied to the Convener's letters of 19 February 2014 on 20 February 2014.

Police Scotland wrote to the Committee on 28 May, enclosing minutes from a meeting between Police Scotland and a Justice for Megrahi liaison group that took place on 2 April 2014 

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 3 June 2014 and agreed to keep the petition open and to keep matters under review.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed

to monitor the progress being made between Justice for Megrahi and Police Scotland and to consider the petition again at a future meeting.

Petition PE1427

Back to top.

PE1427 by Robert Kirkwood on behalf of Leith Links Residents' Association on implementing the Scottish Civil Courts Review recommendations on multi-party actions by making changes to existing protocols that will (1) encourage the Rules Council to use rule of court 2.2 for multi-party actions; (2) modify court fees to a single payment; (3) encourage the Rules Council to introduce a protocol on recovery of documents; (4) clarify the common law right of nuisance, and (5) introduce compulsory insurance.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 25 September 2012 and agreed to keep the petition open pending the introduction of primary legislation to implement Lord Gill's recommendations on multi-party actions.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 18 February 2014 and agreed to write to the Scottish Government asking for an update on its plans regarding the matters raised in the petition.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed to write to the Scottish Government asking it to specifically include the petitioner in its consultation on its approach to matters that will be taken forward by primary legislation following Sheriff Principal Taylor's recommendations and to respond to the petitioners' concerns about the withholding of documents by private companies, and to keep the petition open until after the Scottish Government has developed its approach to this issue

 

 

Petition PE1449

Back to top.

PE1449 by Dr John Wallace Hinton on behalf of Accountability Scotland on preserving an independent Scottish Administrative Justice Council when the UK AJTC system is abolished, ensuring the new body has a critical user-interface to enable base-roots input from the public and that it has complete independence from political or civil service influence. 

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 25 September 2012 and agreed to keep the petition open and to write to the Scottish Government seeking further details of (i) the functions of the non-statutory advisory committee; (ii) the timetable for its creation; and (iii) the timetable for producing and considering long-term options.

At its meeting on 6 November 2012, the Committee considered the petition again and agreed to wait for the further update from the Minister.

The Committee took account of the petitioners' views during the Committee's considerations of the Public Bodies Act consent memorandum for the Public Bodies (Abolition of Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council) Order 2013.  Correspondence in relation to these considerations can be found on the Committee Correspondence webpage.

The Committee considered the petition on at its meeting on 4 June 2013 and agreed to write to the Scottish Government asking to be kept informed of developments with regard to a replacement  for the Scottish Committee of the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council in relation to devolved areas of justice.

The Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs wrote on 27 November 2013 to update the Committee on the establishment of a new interim advisory committee on Administrative Justice and Tribunals.

The petitioners provided a submission to the Committee on 13 February 2014.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 18 February 2014 and agreed to keep the petition open.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 3 June 2014 and agreed to 

write to Accountability Scotland and the Scottish Administrative Justice Council Advisory Committee seeking information on a number of issues, and to keep the petition open.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed to draw the attention of the Scottish Government and Advisory Committee to the letters from Accountability Scotland and the original petitioner, and to close the petition.

 

 

Petition PE1479

Back to top

PE1479 is a petition by Andrew Muir calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 by removing any references to complaints being made timeously.

At its meeting on 1 October 2013, the Public Petitions Committee agreed to refer PE1479 to the Justice Committee.

The Justice Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 17 December 2013.  The Committee decided to write to the petitioner and the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC).

Both the petitioner and the SLCC responded to the Convener's letters in January 2014.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 18 February 2014 and agreed to write to the SLCC welcoming its offer to consult the petitioner as part of its forthecoming review of its rules and to keep the petition open.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 3 June 2014 and agreed to write to the petitioner informing him of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission's (SLCC) decision to consult stakeholders on a proposal to extend the time bar policy and to write to the SLCC encouraging it to consult the petitioner on this proposal, and to keep the petition open

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed to keep the petition open and await the outcome of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission's consultation on its proposal to increase the legal aid time bar from one year to three years with effect from 1 January 2015.

Petition PE1504

PE1504 is a petition by Kathie McLean-Toremar asking the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to consider changing the current legislation regarding Civil Appeals from the Court of Session to the Supreme Court. In accordance with paragraph 1.8 appeals from the Court of Session to the Supreme Court, a party litigant does not have the same rights as a criminal, a murderer, a sex offender or another person making the same Appeal.

At its meeting on 18 February 2014 the Public Petitions Committee agreed to refer the petition to the Justice Committee.

At its meeting on 10 March 2014 the Justice Committee agreed to keep the petition open, to write to the petitioner seeking further information and to consider the issues raised by the petition in the context of its scrutiny of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill.

The Commitee considered the petition at its meeting on 3 June 2014 and agreed to write again to the petitioner seeking clarification regarding the general public interest of her case and the precise reasoning she was given by solicitors for not representing her, and to keep the petition open.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed to close the petition on the basis that it has been considered in the context of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill, which has completed its parliamentary passage.

Petitions PE 1510 and PE 1511

PE 1510 is a petition by Jody Curtis on behalf of Emergency Service and Non Emergency Service Call Centres calling on the Scottish Parliament to undertake a committee inquiry into the closure of Police, Fire, and Non-Emergency Service Centres north of Dundee.

Petition PE 1511 is a petition by Laura Ross calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the decision made by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service to close the Inverness Control Room.

The Committee considered both petitions at its meeting on 24 June 2014 and agreed to (a) consider the issues raised by both petitions during its forthcoming one-off evidence session with HM Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland and HM Chief Inspector of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service; (b) issue a call for written evidence on the issues raised by both petitions; and (c) inform the Justice Sub-Committee on Policing that it is considering Petition PE1510.

To inform the session with the inspectors, the Committee agreed to invite written submissions on the issues raised by the petitions.

Submissions should be emailed to justice.committee@scottish.parliament.uk by no later than 1 August 2014. Please also note that submissions should be no more than 4 sides of A4, should be in Arial 12 and have simple numbered paragraphs and plain text. You should read the Scottish Parliament’s policy on the treatment of written evidence before sending in your submission (http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Helpandguidance/ParliamentPolicy.pdf).

The Committee considered the petitions at its meeting on 4 November 2014 and agreed to keep the petitions open to allow relevant issues to be raised in the context of its scrutiny of the Scottish Government's Draft Budget 2015-16.

Petition PE1501

 

 

PE 1501 is a petition by Stuart Graham on public inquiries into self-inflicted and accidental deaths following suspicious death investigations.

The Committee considered the petition at its meeting on 4 November and agreed to write to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service to ascertain the level of investigation carried out into the 4,000 deaths classed as self-inflicted in the last five years and to consider the petition as part of its scrutiny of the forthcoming legislation on fatal accident inquiries.

 

 

Back to top