Richard Baker MSP

Welcome to Richard Baker MSP's biography pages

Richard Baker MSP

Here you can find out about your MSPs' political activities and how to get in touch with them.

Parliamentary Activities

Search for other Speeches made by Richard Baker

Devolution (Further Powers) Committee 04 December 2014 : Thursday, December 04, 2014
Alex Johnstone

The authority is all yours.



Meeting of the Parliament 03 December 2014 : Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab)

Will the member give way?



Meeting of the Parliament 03 December 2014 : Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab)

The cabinet secretary’s predecessor said that NHS Grampian would be brought more quickly towards parity of funding under the NRAC formula if more funds were made available for the NHS by the UK Government. Is that still the Government’s policy?



Meeting of the Parliament 25 November 2014 : Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab)

The debate has been interesting—perhaps much more interesting than many of us had expected when we came into the chamber. It is impossible to follow or to compete with Stewart Stevenson’s tales of transatlantic adventures, da Vinci code-style mathematical problems and—this was an interesting addition to the debate—“The Simpsons”. We always enjoy Mr Stevenson’s ability to spice up a debate of this nature.

It has been a pleasure to be part of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee as, through its first considerations under its new responsibilities, it has considered the bill. The bill has proved to be a good candidate to initiate that new role because, as we have heard, there has been a great deal of consensus around the legislation and, although it is narrow in its compass, it will have a beneficial effect for legal practice.

As others, including the minister and the convener, have done, I reflect on the fact that dealing with bills introduced by the Scottish Law Commission will be beneficial generally to legislative reform in the Parliament. For too long, bills that had been the subject of considerable consultation and a great deal of work by the commission were not taken forward and were left to gather dust. The commission was left reliant on members coming forward to take up the bills individually, as my colleague Bill Butler did successfully in the previous session with the Damages (Scotland) Act 2011, which I am sure that the minister remembers.

Unfortunately, that was a relatively isolated example. Too many bills on important issues, which could have been equally as beneficial as the one that we are considering, were not progressed, so it is good that with our committee’s parliamentary consideration, we can look forward to more progress with such legislation.

I join others in congratulating the convener and the committee clerks and advisers on their stewardship of the process. I have perhaps not found as many moments of philosophy and poetry in the committee’s deliberations as Mike MacKenzie did. I congratulate him on doing so. He clearly sees debate over the definition of quantities of corned beef in a different light from me. However, it is important to recognise the committee’s good work, so it is right to say that this is an opportunity to reflect on that. In this process, the committee’s work will be beneficial not just to Parliament but to the quality of law.

As others have said, the evidence that we took was almost unanimous in its support for the bill’s proposals. During our deliberations, I asked witnesses about the potential for fraud, to which members have referred, and the Faculty of Advocates expressed concerns, particularly in its oral evidence. All other witnesses were clear that they did not see the legislation opening up greater potential for fraud in transactions.

As we heard from witnesses, if individuals are determined to commit an act of fraud in such transactions, they will find a way of doing so, regardless of whether the bill is passed. We have not heard evidence of a higher number of examples of fraud or error in England since execution in counterpart and the electronic delivery of documents were allowed there. The issue was best summed up by those who said that it will neither reduce nor increase the risk of fraud if we pass the bill.

The other issue that I pursued with witnesses when we took evidence on the bill was the use of pre-signed signature pages, in relation to which specific concerns were raised about the potential for fraud. Witnesses raised concerns not about the legislation itself but about the concept of the use of pre-signed signature pages. As the policy memorandum makes clear, the bill does not change the existing position on that, but nor does it prevent a pre-signed signature page from being attached to a different document, provided that it can be shown that the party concerned clearly authorised or mandated that in advance, or subsequently ratified what had been done, with full knowledge of the content of the new document.

Witnesses expressed some unease about the use of pre-signed signature pages in general. When I asked Dr Ross Anderson of the University of Glasgow about this issue, he said:

“As a solicitor, I would never use them. ... It seems to me that the authorisation that has been given by the client in that situation is essentially a power of attorney to the solicitor to sign the document ... I find the use of pre-signed signature pages odd.”

However, he also acknowledged that the bill might be taking the approach that it is

“simply to reflect some of the practices that are going on in England and ... to be facilitative for cases that may arise.”—[Official Report, Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, 7 October 2014; c 9-10.]

The committee has reached the right conclusion on this issue, given that the legislation is intended to aid flexibility for legal practice in Scotland. We concluded that, although there might be misgivings about the use of pre-signed signature pages, which we recognise and mention in our report, there might also be circumstances in which their use is justified.

It would be wrong to overestimate the economic impact of the legislation for our legal services industry, but I think that it is beneficial, even if it is narrow in its effect. It is right that we heed the advice of the Law Society that the existing practice of signing contracts under Scots law is in need of updating. The society informs us that parties to a contract are switching to English contract law at a later stage because it is more convenient for the execution of contracts. If by passing the bill we can ensure that contracts can in future be concluded under Scots law, clearly that would be beneficial for our important legal services industry, and that is why it is right to support the bill today.

16:33  

Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 19 November 2014 : Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Richard Baker

So we could have had a lot more economic impact if we had made that investment.



Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 19 November 2014 : Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Richard Baker

You have said that there is much more film production in Ireland and Northern Ireland because of the level of investment there. Is there a general assumption that if we invested more, we would get the same level of activity here? Are there any specific examples of where we have lost out?



Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 19 November 2014 : Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Richard Baker

How does the Government and public funding support for the industry in Scotland compare with support in the UK as a whole? Northern Ireland has a specific level of investment, but how do we compare with other parts of the country? Do you have any kind of feel for that?



Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 19 November 2014 : Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Richard Baker

The film strategy has just been launched, as Gillian Berrie has mentioned. It sounds to me from what you are saying that it needs to change radically, even at the outset, if it is going to succeed.



Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 19 November 2014 : Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab)

I am a Labour MSP for North East Scotland.



Meeting of the Parliament 13 November 2014 : Thursday, November 13, 2014
Richard Baker

I could suggest a few more. The construction of the Aberdeen western peripheral route offers significant opportunities for the construction industry in the north-east, which has seen closures and job losses over recent years. Can the minister assure me that, in concluding the final contract with the preferred bidder for the AWPR, the right emphasis will be placed on the use of community benefit clauses, which will help to create a level playing field for local businesses that bid for subcontracts? Will those clauses also be given the appropriate weighting in tenders? If they are weighted at a small fraction of the weighting that is given to cost, as has been the case in the past, that will weaken considerably the impact of their inclusion in those contracts.

Vote DetailMSP VoteResult

S4M-11830.2 John Swinney: The Smith Commission—As an amendment to motion S4M-11830 in the name of Ru
>> Show more
NoCarried

S4M-11830 Ruth Davidson: The Smith Commission—That the Parliament welcomes the publication of the Sm
>> Show more
NoCarried

Amendment 6 moved by Dr Richard Simpson on motion S4M-11826 Maureen Watt: Food (Scotland) Bill—That
>> Show more
YesDefeated

S4M-11825.3 Claire Baker: End of Year Fish Negotiations—As an amendment to motion S4M-11825 in the n
>> Show more
YesDefeated

S4M-11825.2 Jamie McGrigor: End of Year Fish Negotiations—As an amendment to motion S4M-11825 in the
>> Show more
YesDefeated

S4M-11825.1 Tavish Scott: End of Year Fish Negotiations—As an amendment to motion S4M-11825 in the n
>> Show more
AbstainDefeated

S4M-11825 Richard Lochhead: End of Year Fish Negotiations—That the Parliament welcomes the successfu
>> Show more
AbstainCarried

S4M-11763.3 Margaret Burgess: Private Sector Rent Reform—As an amendment to motion S4M-11763 in the
>> Show more
NoCarried

S4M-11763 Mary Fee: Private Sector Rent Reform—That the Parliament notes that, over the last 10 year
>> Show more
NoCarried

S4M-11766.3 Shona Robison: The State of the NHS—As an amendment to motion S4M-11766 in the name of N
>> Show more
NoCarried

Search for other Motions lodged by Richard Baker
EventIdTypeSub TypeMSP NameParty NameConstituencyRegionTitleItemTextFormattedAnswer DateAnswerStatusIdExpectedAnswerDateAnsweredByMspApprovedDateSubmissionDateMeetingDateProductionStatusIdRecordStatusIdStatus DateOnBehalfOfConsideredForMembersBusinessCrossPartySupportRegisteredInterestSupportCountSupportDateIsEventLinkCurrentMinister
Motion S4M-11599.1: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 02/12/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-11573: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 17/11/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-11516: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 12/11/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-10431: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 23/06/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-10306: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 12/06/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-09903: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 01/05/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-08985: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 06/02/2014 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-08291: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 13/11/2013 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-08214: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 06/11/2013 Show Full Motion >>
Motion S4M-08066: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 23/10/2013 Show Full Motion >>
Search for other Questions asked by Richard Baker
EventIdTypeSub TypeMSP NameParty NameConstituencyRegionTitleItemTextFormattedAnswer DateAnswerStatusIdExpectedAnswerDateAnsweredByMspApprovedDateSubmissionDateMeetingDateProductionStatusIdRecordStatusIdStatus DateOnBehalfOfConsideredForMembersBusinessCrossPartySupportRegisteredInterestSupportCountSupportDateIsEventLinkCurrentMinister
Question S4O-03871: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 15/12/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4O-03831: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 10/12/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23459: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 28/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23458: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 28/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23440: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 27/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23441: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 27/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23438: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 27/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23439: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 27/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23428: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 25/11/2014 Show Full Question >>
Question S4W-23197: Richard Baker, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour, Date Lodged: 17/11/2014 Show Full Question >>

Further information

Email our Public Information Service for more information.